Background for Aug 29 post
You can see in the story below evidence of Monsignor Ray Hebert as The Guy you
went to in the nineties with pedophile priest complaints in New Orleans. After Ted, three other men accused Monsignor
Hebert of predatory pedophile sex crimes when they were children at Madonna
Manor. Hebert's pastoral response from the victim assistance office was to sue
all four of them for defamation with the power of the Church behind him. The
men then removed Hebert's name from their lawsuits against the Church and
Hebert went on what appeared to be a press tour to tell the world his name had been
cleared.
However, Hebert died in Jan 2014, and my advisers tell me he no longer can file defamation suits against his accusers no matter how powerful the Church is. There is also legal precedent, dating back to the 1960s and the biography of Jean Harlow, saying the family of a deceased public figure cannot sue for defamation after the sited individual has died.
When victims such as Ted Lausche said they remembered Ray Hebert as a perpetrator, the Monsignor immediately changed from pastor to litigious adversary. In my opinion, the Monsignor's reaction proved he was guilty, or he would not have been afraid of legal discovery using his name, and he would have worked with the four accusers, as that was his job, not filed lawsuits against men who he knew were damaged and vulnerable. In the story below you see Hebert did help other victims who called the New Orleans victim assistance office, as long as they did not name him as the perpetrator:
***************
However, Hebert died in Jan 2014, and my advisers tell me he no longer can file defamation suits against his accusers no matter how powerful the Church is. There is also legal precedent, dating back to the 1960s and the biography of Jean Harlow, saying the family of a deceased public figure cannot sue for defamation after the sited individual has died.
When victims such as Ted Lausche said they remembered Ray Hebert as a perpetrator, the Monsignor immediately changed from pastor to litigious adversary. In my opinion, the Monsignor's reaction proved he was guilty, or he would not have been afraid of legal discovery using his name, and he would have worked with the four accusers, as that was his job, not filed lawsuits against men who he knew were damaged and vulnerable. In the story below you see Hebert did help other victims who called the New Orleans victim assistance office, as long as they did not name him as the perpetrator:
Molestation Case HauntsChurch, Victim
By Bruce Nolan, Times-Picayune [New Orleans LA], December 5, 1999
By Bruce Nolan, Times-Picayune [New Orleans LA], December 5, 1999
QUOTE: 'From the archdiocese's
perspective, the Keane story began in November 1994, when Collins and a cousin
met with Monsignor Ray Hebert and told him what Keane had done to Collins years
earlier. After a follow-up meeting with
Hebert, in which Hebert told him Keane had admitted the truth and the church
would pay for his therapy, Collins felt that Hebert "could not wait to get
him out of the room," Widmann said.'
***************
(More to come)
-ke
-ke
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments have to be emailed to cityofangelslady@yahoo.com to be published. You do not have to be a "member" as it says here, but I will only publish comments that are emailed to me -thanks, kay
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.